








5.9| Average votes grouped by age and by sex: | |||||||
| Age: | 1-12 | 13-17 | 18-25 | 26-35 | 36-49 | 50+ | Total |
| Men: Votes: |
- 0 |
- 0 |
9 1 |
5.5 2 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
6.7 3 |
| Women: Votes: |
- 0 |
7.3 10 |
1 2 |
3.7 3 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
5.7 15 |
| Total: Votes: |
- 0 |
7.3 10 |
3.7 3 |
4.4 5 |
- 0 |
- 0 |
5.9 18 |
| Total includes those who didn't specify sex. | |||||||
I saw this movie and it was great, because once my little sister seen it she is trying to be Brittany Foster but it doesn't look as if she is suceeding. She hates me and tries to act as if she wants to kill me but she is to slow because where is she now!
10/10
jen@ - first review
23.6.2003 - age: 13-17
Heya! We love crazy tania! She rox our world! (if any1 doesn't no hu she is she's the 1 in the mental home with giniger hair) we want pics on her -if n.e. 1 knows her real name plzzzzzzz tell us.
10/10
candybabe_161@ - first review
6.6.2003 - age: 13-17
Oh, come on... don't waste your time and your money to watch this! It's a BAD film I've ever seen in this world!!
1/10
clarette777@ - 2 reviews
22.5.2003 - age: 13-17
This movie was fun, I loved it!! It's definitley a movie I'd see over and over!!
8/10
sexxy_chicana@ - 2 reviews
31.12.2002 - age: 13-17
I love this movie. Everyone did such an amazing job to bring these characters to life. The best thing about was how suspenseful it gets towards the ending. THE IN CROWD is definitely one of my all-time favorite movies!!!!
9/10
rainbowdevil85@ - first review
29.1.2002 - age: 18-25
The beginning was horribly slow and boring. Then the story picked up the pace, but the suspence was really poor and the whole movie was nothing special.
5/10
wojtek@ - 7 reviews
29.11.2000 - age: 26-35
The movie was a bit too predictable. But I liked how there were many events that took place. The guys were yummy!!
8/10
kiwi_70@ - first review
29.8.2000 - age: 13-17
This movie was horrible... It was plain bad...
2/10
coolchica00@ - first review
10.8.2000 - age: 13-17
This is an ok movie, not worth paying to see though...
5/10
googlies@ - 2 reviews
4.8.2000 - age: 13-17
This is way up there with the worst movies I have ever seen.
1/10
thelxepeia@ - 2 reviews
4.8.2000 - age: 18-25
I enjoyed it but it's not a movie I would rave about or watch again once out on video. Overall I wasn't too impressed.
6/10
vidaloca333@ - 2 reviews
27.7.2000 - age: 26-35
This movie is the best movie I have ever seen in months.
10/10
ceila_10@ - 3 reviews
26.7.2000 - age: 13-17
One of the worst movies I have seen ever. Don't waste your time and money!!! There is no plot, bad acting, bad ending, bad screenplay...
1/10
justyna_herman@ - 2 reviews
26.7.2000 - age: 18-25
It's not boring or long at all. It's actually very short and interesting. It has a fabulous plot and the actors are hot and did a great job.
9/10
arjetagusinjac@ - 40 reviews
23.7.2000 - age: 13-17
From the look alike actors to a predictable some what plot the movie lacked talent, substance and suspense. Don't waste your time!
4/10
pamela@ - 2 reviews
22.7.2000 - age: 26-35
I have to disagree with the others. Despite the often clicheish lines, the movie has its moments and if you stick stricly to the thriller side of it, it's worth giving a try.
6/10
wisjer@ - first review
21.7.2000 - age: 26-35
This is one of the worst movies I've seen all year. Their is no plot, no acting and it's long and boring movie. I wouldn't pay to see this one.
1/10
sbilotto@ - 23 reviews
20.7.2000 - age: 26-35
Note: The user reviews posted on this page are personal opinions of our visitors. We are not responsible for their content.